Blog Layout

A review of COP28: charting the path to a sustainable future

The recently concluded COP28 in Dubai stands as a testament to the collective global efforts and challenges faced in the management of climate change. Over the course of 11 days, the gathering of representatives from 197 countries brought together minds from various sectors, offering a panoramic view of both the positive developments and lingering frustrations in the quest for a sustainable future.


COP refers to the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the annual United Nations Climate Change Conference and is the world’s only multilateral decision-making forum on climate change. It’s a meeting of minds for business leaders, climate scientists, young people, Indigenous people, sustainability experts and stakeholders; an opportunity for countries to debate topics, negotiate and agree ways to tackle the climate crisis.


·      Ambition and adaption

The pivotal theme of ambition showcased each nation’s commitment to addressing climate change – an opportunity for countries to set more robust targets and accelerate an economy-wide net zero transition. Ambition hinges on adaption. Adaptation is crucial to mitigate future challenges, with adjustments needed in ecological, social, and economic systems. Adaptation encompasses diverse strategies to deliver tangible, on-the-ground transformation at a local level, from building defences against floods to redesigning communication systems. The final text calls for doubling adaptation finance, with explicit 2030 targets for water security, ecosystem restoration, and health.


·      Energy and fossil fuels

Fast-tracking the energy transition and slashing emissions before 2030 was one of COP28’s priorities. Parties vary in their stance on fossil fuel policies, with some advocating for a complete phaseout, others emphasizing the elimination of "unabated" fossil fuels, and some rejecting the idea. However, agreement was made by some to triple the world's renewable energy capacity by 2030 while doubling global energy-saving efforts over the same period to achieve the goals set out in the Paris Agreement.



a row of solar panels with the sun shining through them

·      Finance

Finance took centre stage as a critical enabler for climate projects, yet progress has been unequal and largely concentrated in richer countries where private investment in green technology is more attracted. Progress was made regarding the new collective quantified goal (NCQG), expanding upon the committed $100 billion from developed nations to fund climate mitigation and adaptation projects in developing countries. The fund will be initially managed by the World Bank.


·      Global Stocktake

This year was the first ever global stocktake - an audit of everything to do with climate change to identify the gaps and chart a path to accelerate climate action. It found that the world is not on track to achieve the goals set out in Paris in 2015. Despite resistance to diluted emissions and fossil fuel language, the final text was improved to include the projection of peak global emissions between 2020-2025, and more assertively urge nations to take diverse actions to reduce emissions and significantly cut non-CO2 emissions, particularly methane, by 2030.


·      Land use and forests

With growing recognition that climate goals demand nature-positivity, new measures to tackle deforestation were announced including the Brazilian ‘Tropical Forests Forever’ fund. The urgent issue of food systems was only briefly touched on which felt like a missed opportunity to tackle a sector responsible for nearly one-third of global emissions.



a foggy forest with lots of trees and plants

·      Loss and damage fund

Agreed at the opening of the first day of COP28 a pledge of financial support from the wealthy countries most responsible for the climate emergency. The $700m pledged covers less than 0.2% needed. The Parties agreed a structural and functional link between the Santiago Network and the Loss & Damage Fund. The Santiago Network supports developing countries to avoid, minimise and address loss and damage caused by climate change. This includes the sharing of knowledge, resources and technical assistance.


Positive developments - NZ and AUS leading the way

Contrary to common perceptions of Europe and the rest of the world being ahead of tackling climate issues, it was exciting to see Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, and the Pacific region sharing cutting-edge projects from our region, notably in mitigation efforts.


  • Aotearoa New Zealand announced in 2021 an increased climate finance commitment of $1.3 billion for 2022-2025, with at least 50 percent targeting adaptation.
  • Sessions hosted by the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) provided insights into plans for a 300% increase in renewables by 2030 and strategies for faster deployment of renewables across the world, which perfectly aligned to Australia's presentation in the Australian Pavilion which outlined a vision of becoming an energy exporting powerhouse. With plans for large super solar sites equivalent in size to Tasmania, exporting electricity, green hydrogen, and green iron ore to Asia and the world, this is a bold step toward transforming not just energy, but the entire economy.
  • Melbourne has appointed a Chief Heat Officer to oversee infrastructure resilience against extreme heat stress and enhance health outcomes with the aim to lower the city's average temperature by 4 degrees, signalling significant potential for impactful, yet straightforward, initiatives.



a sign that says ' dubai expo 2020 ' on it

The middle ground - easing financial barriers

One of the groundbreaking moments of COP28 occurred on Day 1 with the agreement to create the Loss and Damage Fund, signalling a collective commitment to addressing the impacts of climate change. This fund's potential for growth was acknowledged, reflecting optimism for meaningful movement in the subsequent days as more countries confirmed their pledges. This is a huge step forward for the availability of capital for essential projects.


Challenges - building a sustainable business case

While positive intent was evident on the supply side, there remains a universal challenge: building a sustainable business case and obtaining the social mandate for a transformative shift in the world's economy. We have the knowledge, technologies, the intent and the need, so what’s the problem?

The crux of the issue lies in the affordability of change on the demand side. The optimism garnered from the finance sector, needs to translate into real life improvements and financial benefits, rather than creating theoretical reports to align with the ambitious 2030 and 2050 climate targets. Does there need to be a shift toward calculated risk-taking to expedite progress?


Additionally, the complexities and prevalence of political nuances suggested that, at times, political considerations overshadow practical solutions: the prioritisation of politics over the pursuit of tangible solutions. It’s a delicate line we tread.


Whether COP28 will be judged as a success remains to be seen, but what it does do is highlight the importance of collaboration, transparency, knowledge sharing and discussions that transcend geographical boundaries. With continued alliances, innovation and a focussed approach it is the only way to address the urgent climate crisis.


If you would like to learn more about the steps you can take in pursuit of a sustainable future for your business, contact DETA. As leading energy and sustainability consultants in NZ/Australia, we deliver carbon footprint management, energy efficiency services and sustainability consulting services to help businesses achieve their green ambitions. 

A keyhole in the middle of a forest with trees surrounding it
23 Apr, 2024
In the wake of heightened global awareness about climate change, businesses are grappling with a delicate balance between corporate sustainability commitments and public scrutiny. The complexities surrounding sustainability disclosures are not new, however, concerns about unsubstantiated or misleading climate pledges have intensified. Instances of greenwashing have led to legal repercussions and regulatory crackdowns, underscoring the growing scrutiny surrounding corporate sustainability claims. Moreover, challenges related to the integrity of frameworks such as the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) have further fuelled scepticism about corporate climate action, prompting some companies to remain discreet about their environmental aspirations – helpfully termed green hushing. What’s the difference between greenwashing and greenhushing? Green washing involves the sharing of misleading information or unsubstantiated claims regarding a company's environmental practices or products. It typically manifests through clever marketing campaigns or superficial gestures that prioritise image over genuine sustainable process optimisation efforts. From ambiguous labels to exaggerated eco-friendly claims, green washing undermines consumer trust and dilutes the urgency of authentic sustainability actions. On the other side of the coin, green hushing operates in the shadows of corporate silence, emerging as companies opt to keep their climate targets under wraps to avoid accusations of greenwashing. It occurs when companies downplay or conceal their sustainability initiatives, fearing potential scrutiny or reluctance to be held accountable for their environmental impact. This reluctance to disclose genuine efforts stems from various reasons, including concerns about competitiveness, resource allocation, or simply a lack of understanding about the benefits of transparency. 
A windmill and a globe are balancing on a wooden scale.
23 Apr, 2024
New Zealand has slipped into the second recession of the past 18 months and with raising interest rates in an attempt to curb some of the highest inflation in the developed world, times are tough. Within this challenging financial climate, there is also an urgent requirement to innovate New Zealand’s energy systems to enable secure, reliable and affordable electricity supply while reducing emissions. Substantial investment is needed to get us where we need to be energy-wise – a need to generate an additional 530 MW per year until 2050 with the burden of these costs carried by energy users. Initiatives like the now-defunct Government Investment in Decarbonising Industry (GIDI) Fund in New Zealand and similar programs in Australia shone a light on the willingness of businesses to make change, but they also illuminated how capital-intensive the projects are. If the situation feels bleak, there is solution. While the government strategizes on a national level, locally you can take action. To save money and achieve ambitious sustainability targets, you need tight control of energy consumption and its cost. And you can only control them if you know what they are. Energy management: the key to unlocking change For both households and businesses alike, the current economic landscape requires saving and cost reduction – and this is where energy management comes in. Energy efficiency is the essence of cost-efficiency and effectiveness, optimising existing resources for long term economic advantage – arguably the antidote to challenging environmental and economic times.
by Alessandra Ward 19 Apr, 2024
DETA & Cheetham Salt - Decarbonisation Pathway
Show More
Share by: